MyProgressiveRailroading
The platform that enables you to build rich, interactive communities
INDIANAPOLIS interurban electric streetcar traction terminal was world's largest & busiest...

The INDIANAPOLIS traction terminal opened in 1904 and within a decade more than 500 electric passenger and freight trolley cars arrived and departed daily. A passenger tally of 7 million passengers a year passed through the Indianapolis terminal giving it the status of largest and busiest in the world!

By 1914 the electric interurban trolley/streetcar/tram system "had won a place as an important part of the United States transportation system. There were 18,000 miles of interurban track in the country, almost half of it concentrated in the Middle West states, Pennsylvania, New York, California, Massachussetts, and Texas, in that order also had very considerable additional mileage. An immense sum of money, perhaps a billion dollars, was invested in interurban properties. In many cities the great sheds were so bustling with activity that they quite matched the Union Stations of their main line steam railroad rivals." The interurban was often preffered for medium and shorter trips, for here it usually offered faster or more frequent service", in comparison to the main line steam railroads.

By 1918 the interurban system "had 44,800 miles of track, employed 295,000 people, and toted passengers at the rate of 11.3 billion annually."

It is apparent that the interurbans and main line railroads were competing for a portion of the same customers, with the interurbans being more local by catering to the daily  commuter/errand/leisure traveler.

What would the passenger and freight railway system look like today if the interurban and railroad companies merged and were able to weather the competition from the obvious other modes? What do you think would result after combining a 45,000 mile interurban network and a 300 thousand mile mail line railway network? It might closely resemble 'today's proposals from every corner for high-speed-dreams/plans/strategies/ -costing trillions and many years to just get started'...

Quoted: TROLLEY CAR TREASURY. A Century of American Streetcars---Cable Cars, Interurbans & Trolleys---with over 300 nostalgic photographs.

Coyright 1956 by Frank Rowsome. Jr., & Stephen D. Maguire. Library of Congress Catalog #: 56-11054

Stay tuned for the October OPEC summitt, great family entertainment!

 

 


Posted 09-26-2009 11:08 PM by RAILWAYIST

Comments

Larry Kaufman wrote re: INDIANAPOLIS interurban electric streetcar traction terminal was world's largest & busiest...
on 09-27-2009 11:23 AM

At last, a rational history (at least RAILWAYIST appears capable of quoting and retyping accurately) of a past era in railroading.  One answer to his rhetorical question is that mergers were unlikely for the simple reason that railroads were controlled then by the ICC, which had a policy of rejecting mergers involving railroads.  So, yes, it might have been interesting to see what would have happened if the railroad passenger service and the interurban systems ever had been merged, but any reading of history makes it clear that was not about to happen.

JohnS wrote re: INDIANAPOLIS interurban electric streetcar traction terminal was world's largest & busiest...
on 09-28-2009 1:59 PM

Why stop retrogression there?  Why not go back to the towpath canal era.  You wanna talk about efficient - coupla bags of oats and you can pull a hundred tons of coal 15 miles.  Overnight accomodations?  No problem, sleep on the boat and mom sure could cook a good breakfast!  And wages - the whole family worked, the mule boys didn't even need shoes.

RAILWAYIST wrote re: INDIANAPOLIS interurban electric streetcar traction terminal was world's largest & busiest...
on 09-28-2009 6:50 PM

It seemed a logical and efficient integration of the steam & electric railways since both used coal for power. Coal from the mines transported by steam or electric trains to power plants to feed the grid or to power the steam locomotives that were fueled by coal. Looks like a win-win arrangement for the railways. This could work today since there is plenty of coal for the US available.

Larry Kaufman wrote re: INDIANAPOLIS interurban electric streetcar traction terminal was world's largest & busiest...
on 09-29-2009 8:43 AM

More displaying of ignorance in public here.  There were a number of reasons why the railroads transitioned from steam to diesel-electric power.  Steam was incredibly labor intensive, and the transition occurred at a time when railroads were trying to remove every penny of labor they could from their costs.  Diesel-electric power is more reliable and requires less maintenance than did steam.  Of course, none of these factors mean a thing because RAILWAYIST has made up his mind that petroleum is bad; coal is good.

RAILWAYIST wrote re: INDIANAPOLIS interurban electric streetcar traction terminal was world's largest & busiest...
on 09-29-2009 9:10 PM

Will look for a breakdown chart of the synfuel derivatives from coal from the Garrett Co. of 1933. Diesel fuel, 125 octane aviation fuel, gazzoline, various ashphalt products for roofing/roads/sealants, synthetic rubber etc...Domestic coal is a win-win for the US, the railroads, electric utilities, energy independence---keep the money flowing and investing here. This doesn't mean not buying oil---just less of it.

Larry Kaufman wrote re: INDIANAPOLIS interurban electric streetcar traction terminal was world's largest & busiest...
on 09-30-2009 9:56 AM

Yep, just as usual; ignore any comment that doesn't agree with what Mikey posits, then toss out new, even more irrelevant stream of consciousness.